Now Reading: GCC Operating Model Selector
- 01
GCC Operating Model Selector
The GCC Operating Model Selector helps CXOs, tech, and strategy leaders quickly evaluate Captive, BOT, or Hybrid GCC setups across global locations. With editable benchmarks, weighted scoring, and real-time charts, you can make data-driven GCC decisions in minutes.
How to Use
Set Category Weights → Adjust importance across Cost, Talent, Control, Risk, and Speed.
Add Countries → Select up to 3 from the dropdown (e.g., India, Poland, Mexico).
Edit Benchmarks → Use sliders to fine-tune sub-priorities (1 = low, 10 = high).
Click Calculate → Instantly view country scorecards, radar charts, and the winner.
Export Results → Download as Excel for team reviews.
GCC Operating Model Selector
Select up to 3 countries. Adjust benchmarks & weights. Compare Captive, BOT, and Hybrid models instantly.
⚖️ Category Weights (must total 100%)
🌍 Select Countries (max 3)
📊 Results Dashboard
Disclaimer
These tools are meant to provide quick, general insights, not exhaustive advice. They should not replace professional consultation or in-depth analysis. Users are encouraged to verify information and seek expert guidance before making decisions.
Contact Expert
What is the GCC Operating Model Selector?
It’s an interactive calculator that compares Captive, BOT, and Hybrid GCC models across global countries using benchmarks, weights, and scoring.
How do I choose the right GCC operating model for my organization?
The right model depends on your strategic priorities, including cost optimization, talent availability, speed to scale, and level of control. The GCC Operating Model Selector helps you weigh these factors side by side.
What’s the difference between a captive GCC, a hybrid model, and a BOT model?
A captive model gives full ownership and control, a hybrid shares responsibility with a partner, while BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) lets a vendor establish the GCC before handing it over. Each has pros and cons depending on maturity and risk appetite.
Will a captive GCC operating model really reduce costs compared to outsourcing?
Captive models can lower long-term costs by eliminating vendor margins, but hidden costs (governance, infrastructure, compliance) must be considered. Tools like the Selector help you simulate both scenarios.
How do I measure the ROI of a GCC operating model?
ROI is not just about labor arbitrage. It includes capability building, innovation delivery, digital adoption, and enterprise value creation. A weighted decision matrix makes it easier to capture this holistic value.
Which operating model is best for building digital, AI, and innovation capabilities?
Hybrid and captive models typically provide greater control for developing niche capabilities, while BOTs are better for rapid scale. Your choice depends on whether innovation or speed is the priority.
How do GCC operating models affect talent retention and career growth?
Captive models often offer stronger career paths and culture alignment, while vendor-heavy models may struggle with long-term retention. The Selector lets you rate and compare models against talent outcomes.
What risks should I consider when moving from a BOT model to a captive GCC?
Risks include governance gaps, talent attrition during handover, and compliance transfer. A structured transition framework and early planning reduce these risks.
How do companies ensure compliance and data security in different GCC models?
Captives provide the highest control, while hybrid and BOT models require stronger governance and contractual frameworks. Regulatory alignment should be factored into model selection.
What is GCC 3.0, and how does it impact operating models?
GCC 3.0 shifts centers from cost arbitrage to strategic leadership—focusing on digital, AI, and innovation. It pushes enterprises toward models that emphasize control, talent depth, and value creation rather than just efficiency.
Are GCC operating models evolving to support sustainability and ESG goals?
Yes. Many enterprises now evaluate models not just on cost and talent, but also on their ability to align with ESG priorities, local compliance, and sustainable growth practices.
